TCHI vs. CAOS
TCHI (iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. TCHI is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TCHI returned 13.47%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. TCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
TCHI vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHI achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.84% return.
TCHI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCHI vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 6.06% | 33.13% | 9.09% | -12.41% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.84% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHI and CAOS is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TCHI and CAOS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHI vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
TCHI
CAOS
TCHI vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCHI | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.68 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 6.06 | -3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCHI vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHI drawdown since its inception was -43.96%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHI and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHI | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.96% | -3.89% | -40.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.73% | -0.76% | -19.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.78% | -3.60% | -24.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.21% | -1.04% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.07% | -0.92% | -20.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 0.33% | +9.25% |
Volatility
TCHI vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.48%. This indicates that TCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHI | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 0.48% | +10.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.53% | 1.09% | +19.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 1.56% | +26.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 4.20% | +30.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 4.20% | +30.71% |
TCHI vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHI vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
TCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.49% | 4.28% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHI and CAOS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCHI has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to CAOS (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHI dropped -43.96% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, TCHI leads with 13.47% vs 3.63% for CAOS. On fees, TCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TCHI has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
TCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
TCHI is categorized as Technology Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TCHI and 0.63% for CAOS.
CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCHI and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer