PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCCBX vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCCBX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than DNYMX's 0.98% return.


TCCBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TCCBX and DNYMX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCCBX vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCCBX
TCCBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TCCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TCCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCCBXDNYMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

4.63

-2.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.96

10.39

-6.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

4.18

-2.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

12.55

-9.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.34

56.41

-46.07

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCCBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCCBX and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCCBXDNYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

4.63

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

1.33

+0.77

Drawdowns

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCCBX drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum DNYMX drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCCBX and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCCBXDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-3.19%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.77%

-0.24%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.42%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

Volatility

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class (TCCBX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.20%. This indicates that TCCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCCBXDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.20%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

0.49%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17%

0.65%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

0.88%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

1.05%

+1.18%

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCCBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCCBX vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

TCCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%
TCCBX
Ambrus Tax-Conscious California Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.92%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCCBX and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCCBX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCCBX dropped -1.77% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCCBX and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer