TCAL vs. TSMY
TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAL returned -1.87% vs 92.13% for TSMY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSMY.
Performance
TCAL vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.
TCAL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -1.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 37.04%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 92.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCAL vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | -2.88% | 1.58% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 62.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAL and TSMY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAL vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
TCAL
TSMY
TCAL vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCAL | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.50 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 5.98 | -6.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 22.18 | -22.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCAL | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 3.21 | -3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.56 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
TCAL vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAL | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -31.15% | +23.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -15.50% | +8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -1.37% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -5.51% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.17% | -1.50% |
Volatility
TCAL vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 2.46%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAL | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 9.52% | -7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 22.68% | -15.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.31% | 28.87% | -19.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 33.22% | -21.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 33.22% | -21.97% |
TCAL vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAL vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, less than TSMY's 52.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | 11.96% | 8.34% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 52.19% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAL and TSMY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMY has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to TCAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.
TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.19%, compared with 11.96% for TCAL.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.99% for TSMY.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAL and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer