TCAL vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAL returned -1.87% vs 11.44% for OMAH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TCAL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

TCAL vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.

TCAL

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: -2.88%
• 6M: -2.97%
• 1Y: -1.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	-2.88%	1.58%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and OMAH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.59

The correlation between TCAL and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCAL vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAL	OMAH
Industrials	19.3%	-
Healthcare	18.7%	7.0%
Financial Services	15.0%	38.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	16.2%
Technology	11.3%	13.6%
Utilities	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-
Energy	1.3%	10.5%
Communication Services	0.9%	9.8%

Return for Risk

TCAL vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL

TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCAL	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.43	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	2.02	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.25	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	3.82	-4.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	9.48	-10.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCAL vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCAL	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	1.43	-1.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.70	-0.80

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAL	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-11.83%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-3.00%	-4.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-2.65%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-1.26%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	1.21%	+1.46%

Volatility

TCAL vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that TCAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAL	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	1.93%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.08%	5.49%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.31%	8.05%	+1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.25%	13.21%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.25%	13.21%	-1.96%

TCAL vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAL vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	11.96%	8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAL and OMAH in my portfolio?

TCAL and OMAH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAL or OMAH?

TCAL has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, TCAL or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAL or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAL or OMAH?

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAL or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 11.96% for TCAL.

What is the main difference between TCAL and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.