TCAI vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TCAI (Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TCAI is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

TCAI vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAI achieves a 86.83% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 49.25% return.

TCAI

• 1D: -4.84%
• 1M: 10.54%
• YTD: 86.83%
• 6M: 82.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -3.12%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: 49.25%
• 6M: 46.84%
• 1Y: 87.39%
• 3Y*: 51.19%
• 5Y*: 28.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAI vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCAI Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF	86.83%	17.27%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	49.25%	19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAI and QTUM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025	0.81

TCAI vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAI	QTUM
Technology	51.4%	81.6%
Industrials	25.4%	8.8%
Utilities	8.6%	-
Financial Services	7.1%	0.0%
Energy	4.7%	-
Communication Services	1.6%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

TCAI vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 88
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAI vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCAI	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.02	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.51	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.75	—

Drawdowns

TCAI vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAI drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAI and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAI	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-38.45%	+22.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-3.21%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-8.22%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TCAI	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.57%	29.10%	+8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.57%	27.17%	+10.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.57%	27.48%	+10.09%

TCAI vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAI vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

TCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than QTUM's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.72%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%
TCAI Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF	0.03%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAI and QTUM in my portfolio?

TCAI and QTUM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TCAI or QTUM?

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAI or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TCAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAI or QTUM?

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.03% for TCAI.

What is the main difference between TCAI and QTUM?

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TCAI and 0.40% for QTUM.