TCAF vs. SCHK
TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TCAF is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TCAF returned 17.42%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
TCAF vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 8.54% return.
TCAF
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TCAF vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 4.55% | 15.45% | 20.93% | 9.71% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAF and SCHK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between TCAF and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
TCAF vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCAF
SCHK
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
TCAF
SCHK
Healthcare
TCAF
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
TCAF
SCHK
Communication Services
TCAF
SCHK
Utilities
TCAF
SCHK
Financial Services
TCAF
SCHK
Industrials
TCAF
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
TCAF
SCHK
Energy
TCAF
SCHK
Basic Materials
TCAF
SCHK
Real Estate
TCAF
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAF vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
TCAF
SCHK
TCAF vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.65 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 11.81 | -5.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAF vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -34.80% | +18.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -8.97% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -19.21% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -2.98% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -5.16% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.01% | +0.87% |
Volatility
TCAF vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) is 4.21%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that TCAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAF | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.96% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 10.10% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 12.84% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.34% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 19.12% | -5.10% |
TCAF vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAF vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TCAF and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to TCAF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 3-year performance, SCHK leads with 20.74% vs 17.42% for TCAF. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 17.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.03% for SCHK.
SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAF and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer