TCAF vs. QDSNX
TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) and QDSNX (AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N) are both funds - TCAF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while QDSNX is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAF returned 16.10% vs 13.30% for QDSNX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAF charges 0.31%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for QDSNX.
Performance
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than QDSNX's 4.87% return.
TCAF
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDSNX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 4.37% | 15.45% | 20.93% | 9.71% |
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 4.87% | 16.14% | 9.56% | 7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCAF and QDSNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between TCAF and QDSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCAF vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank
TCAF
QDSNX
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCAF | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.52 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 6.97 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 19.53 | -13.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and QDSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCAF | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -7.15% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -1.97% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -1.41% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -1.45% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 0.70% | +2.16% |
Volatility
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.72%. This indicates that TCAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCAF | QDSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 1.72% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.20% | 3.68% | +5.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 5.06% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 7.64% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 7.30% | +6.68% |
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCAF vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison
TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than QDSNX's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 1.90% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 11.18% | 8.01% | 5.99% | 1.83% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCAF and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCAF has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to QDSNX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.
QDSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCAF and QDSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer