PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRDGX's 7.60% return.


TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRDGX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.23%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
6.51%15.45%20.93%8.40%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.60%14.74%13.48%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and PRDGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.82

The correlation between TCAF and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAFPRDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.41

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

9.85

-2.57

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAFPRDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.66

+0.60

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-49.79%

+33.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-7.34%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-5.42%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.79%

+1.03%

Volatility

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) have volatilities of 2.43% and 2.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAFPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

2.33%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

7.56%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

9.72%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

14.06%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

15.88%

-1.94%

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.52%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAF and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAF has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to PRDGX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

PRDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAF and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer