PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than PRDGX's 10.76% return.


TCAF

1D
1.54%
1M
1.74%
6M
10.14%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.19%

PRDGX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.31%
6M
8.04%
YTD
10.76%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
12.88%
ALL TIME*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$20.52M$22.08M$27.72M

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
10.23%15.45%20.93%9.71%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
10.76%14.74%13.48%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and PRDGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.82

The correlation between TCAF and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCAFPRDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.46

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

10.26

-4.15

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-49.79%

+33.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-7.34%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-14.15%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.96%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-5.39%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.76%

+1.16%

Volatility

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 2.45%. This indicates that TCAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAFPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.45%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

7.44%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

9.88%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

14.03%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.82%

-1.90%

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAF vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than PRDGX's 7.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.31%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.45%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAF and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAF has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to PRDGX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

PRDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAF and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer