TBXU vs. CRMG
TBXU (Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. TBXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
TBXU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBXU achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -57.62% return.
TBXU
- 1D
- 4.10%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -56.45%
- 1Y
- -62.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBXU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TBXU Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | -1.39% | 18.24% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -57.62% | 19.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBXU and CRMG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBXU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
TBXU
CRMG
TBXU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TBXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBXU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | -0.67 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
TBXU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBXU drawdown since its inception was -26.53%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBXU and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBXU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -74.38% | +47.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -70.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.29% | -68.99% | +51.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.79% | -37.92% | +29.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.28% | — |
Volatility
TBXU vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBXU | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.38% | 75.38% | -34.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 75.55% | -34.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 75.55% | -34.17% |
TBXU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBXU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
TBXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBXU Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 1.68% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBXU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TBXU.
TBXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TBXU and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for TBXU and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer