TBXU vs. CRMG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TBXU (Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. TBXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

TBXU vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TBXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBXU achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -65.43% return.

TBXU

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 10.97%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: 22.48%
• 6M: -48.98%
• YTD: -65.43%
• 1Y: -67.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -56.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBXU vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TBXU Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF	4.14%	17.10%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-65.43%	18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TBXU and CRMG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

TBXU vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBXU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBXU vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TBXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBXU	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.84	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.48	—

Drawdowns

TBXU vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBXU drawdown since its inception was -26.53%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBXU and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBXU	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-79.83%	+53.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-75.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.64%	-74.70%	+62.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.62%	-41.35%	+31.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	46.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TBXU	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	64.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.24%	78.11%	-35.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.24%	75.58%	-33.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.24%	75.58%	-33.34%

TBXU vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBXU vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

TBXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TBXU Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF	1.94%	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBXU and CRMG in my portfolio?

TBXU and CRMG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TBXU or CRMG?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBXU or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TBXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBXU or CRMG?

TBXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between TBXU and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TBXU and 0.75% for CRMG.