PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBXU vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBXU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TBXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBXU achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 19.79% return.


TBXU

1D
4.10%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
-3.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
-0.21%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
19.79%
6M
10.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBXU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TBXU and COTG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBXU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Biotech Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TBXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBXU vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBXUCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.21

+0.83

Drawdowns

TBXU vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBXU drawdown since its inception was -26.53%, roughly equal to the maximum COTG drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBXU and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBXUCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.53%

-25.69%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.29%

-21.87%

+4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.79%

-8.50%

-0.29%

Volatility

TBXU vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBXUCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.38%

40.52%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.38%

40.52%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.38%

40.52%

+0.86%

TBXU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBXU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

TBXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TBXU and COTG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TBXU.

TBXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TBXU and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBXU and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer