TBX vs. SKOR
TBX (ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury) and SKOR (FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TBX is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while SKOR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TBX returned 2.10%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for SKOR. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. TBX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for SKOR.
Performance
TBX vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TBX has underperformed SKOR with an annualized return of 2.10%, while SKOR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.81% annualized return.
TBX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
SKOR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
TBX vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.28% | -1.15% | 8.52% | 3.99% | 18.31% | 1.70% | -9.96% | -5.20% | 1.25% | -2.61% |
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 0.35% | 7.99% | 4.42% | 7.64% | -9.88% | -1.40% | 8.84% | 10.69% | -1.25% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBX and SKOR is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014 | -0.68 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TBX and SKOR has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.68 to -0.90, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBX vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank
TBX
SKOR
TBX vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBX | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.32 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.24 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 7.73 | -5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBX vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and SKOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBX | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -15.98% | -25.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.08% | -2.09% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.77% | -3.11% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.77% | -15.13% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.46% | -15.98% | -3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -0.76% | -16.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.60% | -2.64% | -23.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 0.60% | +0.94% |
Volatility
TBX vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.83%. This indicates that TBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBX | SKOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.83% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.52% | 2.07% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 2.72% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 4.43% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 4.91% | +2.23% |
TBX vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBX vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison
TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than SKOR's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKOR FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund | 4.67% | 4.70% | 4.90% | 3.90% | 2.57% | 2.55% | 3.38% | 3.53% | 2.85% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 2.25% |
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.04% | 3.45% | 6.58% | 4.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.53% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBX and SKOR have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SKOR (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs SKOR's -15.98%.
On 10-year performance, SKOR leads with 2.81% vs 2.10% for TBX. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SKOR has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TBX.
SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.04% for TBX.
TBX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. TBX tracks ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TBX and 0.22% for SKOR.
SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBX and SKOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer