TBX vs. HGER
TBX (ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBX is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBX returned 4.72%/yr vs 20.87%/yr for HGER. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
TBX vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 27.03% return.
TBX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
HGER
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 6M
- 26.30%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBX vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 2.92% | -1.15% | 8.52% | 3.99% | 13.39% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 27.03% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBX and HGER is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.00 |
The correlation between TBX and HGER shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TBX vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBX
HGER
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TBX
HGER
-
Basic Materials
TBX
-
HGER
Communication Services
TBX
-
HGER
-
Consumer Cyclical
TBX
-
HGER
-
Consumer Defensive
TBX
-
HGER
-
Energy
TBX
-
HGER
-
Healthcare
TBX
-
HGER
-
Industrials
TBX
-
HGER
-
Real Estate
TBX
-
HGER
-
Technology
TBX
-
HGER
-
Utilities
TBX
-
HGER
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBX vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
TBX
HGER
TBX vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBX | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.43 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 4.90 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 16.29 | -14.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBX | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 2.35 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.89 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
TBX vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBX | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -23.31% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | -8.09% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.77% | -8.84% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.22% | -5.80% | -11.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.64% | -7.65% | -18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.43% | -0.63% |
Volatility
TBX vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) is 1.68%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that TBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBX | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 4.06% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.39% | 14.55% | -11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 16.90% | -11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.44% | 17.61% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 17.61% | -10.47% |
TBX vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBX vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than HGER's 5.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.58% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.05% | 3.45% | 6.58% | 4.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.53% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBX and HGER have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to TBX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 20.87% vs 4.72% for TBX. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TBX has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 20.87% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TBX.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.58%, compared with 3.05% for TBX.
TBX is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while HGER is Commodities. TBX tracks ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%), while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TBX and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBX and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer