TBWIX vs. TINGX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TBWIX (Thornburg Better World International Fund) and TINGX (Thornburg International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Thornburg. Over the past 10 years, TBWIX returned 10.54%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for TINGX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TBWIX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TINGX.

Performance

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBWIX achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than TINGX's 8.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TBWIX has outperformed TINGX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while TINGX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.

TBWIX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 3.30%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 1Y: 15.69%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 5.23%
• 10Y*: 10.54%
• ALL TIME*: 10.66%

TINGX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: 6.55%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 1Y: 9.77%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 6.63%
• ALL TIME*: 6.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TBWIX Thornburg Better World International Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TBWIX Thornburg Better World International Fund	7.25%	24.25%	7.10%	12.72%	-18.02%	20.88%	26.67%	24.57%	-13.61%	22.88%
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund	8.60%	10.63%	2.46%	18.41%	-26.05%	-4.22%	34.34%	26.27%	-16.75%	34.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TBWIX and TINGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.86

The correlation between TBWIX and TINGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TBWIX vs. TINGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBWIX

TBWIX Risk / Return Rank: 32
TBWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
TBWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
TBWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TBWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TBWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

TINGX

TINGX Risk / Return Rank: 16
TINGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TINGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TINGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TINGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TINGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBWIX	TINGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.65	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.02	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	0.93	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	2.76	+1.64

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the TINGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBWIX and TINGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBWIX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, smaller than the maximum TINGX drawdown of -62.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBWIX and TINGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBWIX	TINGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.11%	-62.73%	+22.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.01%	-11.83%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.49%	-19.94%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.11%	-43.27%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.11%	-43.27%	+3.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.15%	+4.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-13.49%	+3.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	4.00%	-0.29%

Volatility

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) is 3.04%, while Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that TBWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBWIX	TINGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	6.73%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	14.45%	-3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.15%	16.93%	-3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	17.45%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	16.98%	-0.20%

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBWIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than TINGX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBWIX vs. TINGX - Dividend Comparison

TBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than TINGX's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TBWIX Thornburg Better World International Fund	1.42%	1.53%	1.40%	1.55%	0.87%	15.10%	0.40%	1.17%	10.14%	3.53%	5.99%	0.00%
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund	0.99%	1.08%	8.40%	0.58%	0.72%	6.86%	1.17%	0.72%	4.39%	3.60%	0.36%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBWIX and TINGX in my portfolio?

TBWIX and TINGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBWIX or TINGX?

TINGX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to TBWIX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBWIX dropped -40.11% vs TINGX's -62.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.