TINGX vs. LTMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX).
TINGX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Jan 31, 2007. LTMFX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Sep 27, 1984.
Performance
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | -6.59% | 10.63% | 2.46% | 18.41% | -26.05% | -4.22% | 34.34% | 26.27% | -16.75% | 34.94% |
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | -0.28% | 5.74% | 1.84% | 3.83% | -5.27% | -0.18% | 2.97% | 3.81% | 1.00% | 2.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINGX achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly lower than LTMFX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TINGX has outperformed LTMFX with an annualized return of 5.28%, while LTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
TINGX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -10.23%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
LTMFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LTMFX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TINGX vs. LTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
TINGX
LTMFX
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) and Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINGX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 1.34 | -1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 1.86 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.51 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 1.49 | -1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 6.83 | -6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINGX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.34 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.48 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.83 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between TINGX and LTMFX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Dividend Comparison
TINGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than LTMFX's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINGX Thornburg International Growth Fund | 1.15% | 1.08% | 8.40% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 6.86% | 1.17% | 0.72% | 4.39% | 3.60% | 0.36% | 0.29% |
LTMFX Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund | 3.25% | 4.28% | 3.60% | 2.11% | 1.62% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.78% | 1.83% | 1.64% | 1.57% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINGX drawdown since its inception was -62.73%, which is greater than LTMFX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINGX and LTMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINGX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.73% | -8.40% | -54.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -2.95% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.27% | -8.40% | -34.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.27% | -8.40% | -34.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -1.89% | -15.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -1.64% | -12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 0.64% | +3.14% |
Volatility
TINGX vs. LTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg International Growth Fund (TINGX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) at 0.58%. This indicates that TINGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TINGX | LTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 0.58% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 1.10% | +9.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 3.29% | +13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 2.32% | +14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 2.26% | +14.70% |