PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBWIX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBWIX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 21.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TBWIX having a 10.97% annualized return and BUFIX not far ahead at 11.18%.


TBWIX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
2.89%
6M
2.30%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
10.97%

BUFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.30%
YTD
21.21%
6M
21.62%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBWIX
Thornburg Better World International Fund
2.89%24.25%7.10%12.72%-18.02%20.88%26.67%24.57%-13.61%22.88%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
21.21%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TBWIX and BUFIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.83

The correlation between TBWIX and BUFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBWIX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBWIX
TBWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TBWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TBWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBWIXBUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.03

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

7.02

-3.25

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBWIX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBWIX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBWIX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBWIXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.11%

-55.09%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-12.85%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.49%

-15.52%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

-34.93%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.11%

-34.93%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

0.00%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-9.15%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.71%

-0.12%

Volatility

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) is 3.44%, while Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that TBWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBWIXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

8.83%

-5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

16.71%

-6.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

18.84%

-5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.91%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

17.66%

-0.80%

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBWIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBWIX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

TBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than BUFIX's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.70%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
TBWIX
Thornburg Better World International Fund
1.48%1.53%1.40%1.55%0.87%15.10%0.40%1.17%10.14%3.53%5.99%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBWIX and BUFIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to TBWIX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBWIX dropped -40.11% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

BUFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBWIX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer