PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBWIX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBWIX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 10.10% return.


TBWIX

1D
1.07%
1M
3.43%
YTD
4.58%
6M
6.00%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
12.30%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
10.68%

RWIIX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.63%
YTD
10.10%
6M
12.82%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBWIX
Thornburg Better World International Fund
4.58%24.25%7.10%12.72%-18.02%20.88%26.67%24.57%-13.61%1.01%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
10.10%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TBWIX and RWIIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.62

The correlation between TBWIX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBWIX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBWIX
TBWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TBWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TBWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBWIXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.41

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.41

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

9.13

-5.22

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBWIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBWIX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBWIXRWIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.14

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.16

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.38

+0.26

Drawdowns

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBWIX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBWIX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBWIXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.11%

-20.34%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.01%

-6.94%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.49%

-20.34%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

-20.34%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

0.00%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-7.82%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.59%

+0.90%

Volatility

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Better World International Fund (TBWIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBWIXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.55%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

8.34%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

11.06%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

11.53%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

10.91%

+5.95%

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBWIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBWIX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

TBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than RWIIX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.93%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%
TBWIX
Thornburg Better World International Fund
1.46%1.53%1.40%1.55%0.87%15.10%0.40%1.17%10.14%3.53%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBWIX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBWIX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to RWIIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBWIX dropped -40.11% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBWIX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer