TBUX vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TBUX returned 4.66% vs 29.43% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TBUX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

TBUX vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.32% return.

TBUX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 2.01%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 5.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 2.50%
• 6M: 21.40%
• YTD: 26.32%
• 1Y: 29.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBUX vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF	2.17%	5.37%	5.60%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	26.32%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TBUX and DCMT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.10

The correlation between TBUX and DCMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TBUX vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBUX

TBUX Risk / Return Rank: 99
TBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 52
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBUX vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBUX	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.06	1.58	+5.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	14.07	2.18	+11.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.06	1.27	+1.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	46.63	1.85	+44.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	174.44	6.54	+167.90

TBUX vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBUX Sharpe Ratio is 7.06, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBUX and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBUX vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.82%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBUX	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-15.96%	+14.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-15.96%	+15.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.33%	+9.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-3.54%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	4.51%	-4.48%

Volatility

TBUX vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) is 0.20%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that TBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBUX	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	5.79%	-5.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.48%	16.87%	-16.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	18.76%	-18.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.06%	16.01%	-14.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.06%	16.01%	-14.95%

TBUX vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBUX vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.91%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF	4.44%	4.67%	5.39%	4.66%	2.58%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBUX and DCMT in my portfolio?

TBUX and DCMT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBUX or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to TBUX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.82% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, TBUX or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.43% vs 4.66% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBUX or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.43% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBUX or DCMT?

TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBUX or DCMT?

TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 2.91% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between TBUX and DCMT?

TBUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.