TBUX vs. COMT
TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TBUX returned 5.85%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for COMT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. TBUX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
TBUX vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
TBUX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
TBUX vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.65% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.22% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBUX and COMT is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TBUX and COMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
TBUX vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBUX
COMT
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
TBUX
COMT
-
Communication Services
TBUX
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
TBUX
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
TBUX
COMT
-
Healthcare
TBUX
COMT
-
Industrials
TBUX
COMT
-
Basic Materials
TBUX
COMT
-
Utilities
TBUX
COMT
-
Energy
TBUX
COMT
-
Financial Services
TBUX
COMT
Real Estate
TBUX
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBUX vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
TBUX
COMT
TBUX vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBUX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.08 | 1.40 | +1.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 39.71 | 5.95 | +33.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 170.19 | 14.11 | +156.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBUX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.13 | 2.24 | +4.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.89 | 0.20 | +3.68 |
Drawdowns
TBUX vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBUX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -51.89% | +50.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -8.02% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.33% | -13.31% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -4.82% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -24.07% | +23.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 3.38% | -3.35% |
Volatility
TBUX vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) is 0.19%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that TBUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBUX | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | 7.37% | -7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 18.80% | -18.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67% | 21.29% | -20.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 21.06% | -19.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 18.89% | -17.82% |
TBUX vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBUX vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBUX and COMT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to TBUX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.79% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.86% vs 5.85% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.48% for TBUX.
TBUX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.48% for COMT.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.13 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBUX and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer