TBUX vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. TBUX is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, TBUX returned 4.79% vs 3.98% for CLIP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBUX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

TBUX vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBUX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.52% return.

TBUX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 5.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBUX vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF	1.73%	5.37%	6.38%	3.87%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.52%	4.23%	5.26%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TBUX and CLIP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.05

Return for Risk

TBUX vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBUX

TBUX Risk / Return Rank: 99
TBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBUX vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBUX	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.14	17.39	-10.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	14.42	72.61	-58.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.09	21.25	-18.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	48.00	142.78	-94.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	188.18	1,155.67	-967.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBUX vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBUX Sharpe Ratio is 7.14, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBUX and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBUX	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.14	17.39	-10.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.90	10.71	-6.81

Drawdowns

TBUX vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBUX drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBUX and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBUX	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-0.08%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-0.03%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.00%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.00%	+0.03%

Volatility

TBUX vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.05%. This indicates that TBUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBUX	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	0.05%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.44%	0.14%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	0.23%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.07%	0.44%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.07%	0.44%	+0.63%

TBUX vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBUX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TBUX vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

TBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than CLIP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.91%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%	0.00%	0.00%
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF	4.48%	4.67%	5.39%	4.66%	2.58%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBUX and CLIP in my portfolio?

TBUX and CLIP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBUX or CLIP?

TBUX has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to CLIP (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBUX dropped -1.79% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, TBUX or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, TBUX leads with 4.79% vs 3.98% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBUX or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, TBUX has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBUX or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for TBUX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBUX or CLIP?

TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 3.91% for CLIP.

What is the main difference between TBUX and CLIP?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TBUX and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.39 vs 7.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.