TBLLX vs. FRQKX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX).

TBLLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 25, 2021. FRQKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.

Performance

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLLX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund	-1.09%	20.35%	15.04%	21.21%	-18.10%	4.24%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	0.27%	9.91%	4.42%	8.62%	-12.30%	0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLLX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FRQKX's 0.27% return.

TBLLX

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -6.12%
• YTD: -1.09%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQKX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: 6.38%
• 5Y*: 2.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLLX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.

TBLLX

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund

FRQKX

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K

Return for Risk

TBLLX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLLX

TBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 64
TBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FRQKX

FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBLLX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.73	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.42	-0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	2.37	-0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.63	9.37	-1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FRQKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLLX and FRQKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBLLX	FRQKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.73	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.70	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between TBLLX and FRQKX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

TBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FRQKX's 3.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TBLLX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund	2.50%	2.47%	1.92%	1.72%	1.96%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%
FRQKX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K	3.24%	3.09%	2.91%	2.86%	5.12%	6.11%	3.61%	2.57%

Drawdowns

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLLX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, which is greater than FRQKX's maximum drawdown of -16.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLLX and FRQKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLLX	FRQKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.50%	-16.97%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.78%	-3.42%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-2.45%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-3.95%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	0.86%	+1.68%

Volatility

TBLLX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) at 2.14%. This indicates that TBLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLLX	FRQKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	2.14%	+3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	2.96%	+6.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	4.67%	+11.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	5.53%	+10.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.62%	5.77%	+9.85%