PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLLX vs. FRKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
-1.09%20.35%15.04%21.21%-18.10%4.24%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
0.27%9.91%4.40%8.17%-11.57%0.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLLX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FRKMX's 0.27% return.


TBLLX

1D
2.82%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
1.54%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
10Y*

FRKMX

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
0.27%
6M
1.36%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLLX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBLLX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLLX
TBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FRKMX
FRKMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FRKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLLXFRKMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.72

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

2.41

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.35

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.63

9.34

-1.71

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FRKMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLLX and FRKMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLLXFRKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.72

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.71

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between TBLLX and FRKMX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison

TBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FRKMX's 3.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
2.50%2.47%1.92%1.72%1.96%2.20%0.00%0.00%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
3.25%3.11%3.12%2.92%4.66%3.65%2.56%1.85%

Drawdowns

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLLX drawdown since its inception was -26.50%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLLX and FRKMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLLXFRKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.50%

-16.04%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-3.42%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-2.44%

-4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-3.64%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.86%

+1.68%

Volatility

TBLLX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) at 2.14%. This indicates that TBLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBLLXFRKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

2.14%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

2.95%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

4.63%

+11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

5.23%

+10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

5.14%

+10.48%