TBLL vs. QQQ
TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBLL returned 3.35%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
TBLL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
TBLL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.43% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.62% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 28.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLL and QQQ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2017 | -0.06 |
TBLL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBLL
QQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TBLL
QQQ
Basic Materials
TBLL
-
QQQ
Communication Services
TBLL
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TBLL
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
TBLL
-
QQQ
Energy
TBLL
-
QQQ
Healthcare
TBLL
-
QQQ
Industrials
TBLL
-
QQQ
Real Estate
TBLL
-
QQQ
Technology
TBLL
-
QQQ
Utilities
TBLL
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TBLL
QQQ
TBLL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +214.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 102.92 | 1.45 | +101.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 416.84 | 3.51 | +413.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3,533.11 | 13.49 | +3,519.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94 | 2.64 | +18.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.53 | 0.81 | +6.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.26 | 0.41 | +3.85 |
Drawdowns
TBLL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -82.97% | +82.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -11.96% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -22.77% | +22.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | -35.12% | +34.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -32.79% | +32.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.11% | -3.11% |
Volatility
TBLL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.05%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 4.49% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 12.10% | -11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 15.94% | -15.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 22.38% | -21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 22.29% | -21.73% |
TBLL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.18% for QQQ.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer