TBLJX vs. FRQAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TBLJX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund) and FRQAX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, TBLJX returned 18.24%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for FRQAX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TBLJX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FRQAX.

Performance

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLJX achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.95% return.

TBLJX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQAX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 3.95%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 10.15%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 4.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBLJX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund	11.06%	18.81%	13.87%	20.14%	-17.93%	3.89%
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	3.95%	9.54%	4.21%	8.24%	-12.60%	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLJX and FRQAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021	0.75

The correlation between TBLJX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBLJX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLJX

TBLJX Risk / Return Rank: 63
TBLJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TBLJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TBLJX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TBLJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TBLJX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FRQAX

FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBLJX	FRQAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.46	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.61	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.95	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	12.54	+0.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLJX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBLJX	FRQAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.46	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.51	+0.14

Drawdowns

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLJX drawdown since its inception was -25.86%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLJX and FRQAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBLJX	FRQAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.86%	-38.22%	+12.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-3.46%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.55%	-5.27%	-9.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.46%	-4.57%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	0.81%	+1.13%

Volatility

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund (TBLJX) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that TBLJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBLJX	FRQAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	1.67%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	3.43%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	4.15%	+6.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	5.56%	+8.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	5.33%	+9.12%

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLJX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBLJX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

TBLJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than FRQAX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	2.82%	2.72%	2.71%	2.46%	4.74%	5.76%	3.26%	2.93%	5.33%	16.05%	2.18%	3.81%
TBLJX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2040 Fund	2.32%	2.58%	2.05%	2.19%	1.97%	2.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBLJX and FRQAX in my portfolio?

TBLJX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBLJX or FRQAX?

TBLJX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLJX dropped -25.86% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.