PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLGX vs. FRBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than FRBHX's 13.36% return.


TBLGX

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.32%
YTD
7.77%
6M
8.15%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10Y*

FRBHX

1D
-0.51%
1M
3.54%
YTD
13.36%
6M
15.04%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
7.77%15.49%3.29%
FRBHX
Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6
13.36%23.65%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and FRBHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024

0.93

The correlation between TBLGX and FRBHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. FRBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX
TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FRBHX
FRBHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRBHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRBHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRBHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FRBHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRBHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLGXFRBHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.17

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

14.13

-1.31

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FRBHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and FRBHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLGXFRBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.43

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.40

-0.77

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, which is greater than FRBHX's maximum drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and FRBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLGXFRBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-15.29%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-9.77%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.51%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-1.78%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.19%

-0.70%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) is 2.63%, while Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that TBLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLGXFRBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.26%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

10.51%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

12.78%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

15.79%

-4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.38%

15.79%

-4.41%

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBHX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLGX vs. FRBHX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FRBHX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRBHX
Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6
4.22%2.53%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.67%2.87%2.48%2.21%2.60%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TBLGX and FRBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRBHX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to TBLGX (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLGX dropped -23.25% vs FRBHX's -15.29%.

FRBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLGX and FRBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer