PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLBX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLBX achieves a 5.87% return, which is significantly higher than FRHMX's 3.92% return.


TBLBX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
YTD
5.87%
6M
6.57%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
10Y*

FRHMX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.13%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.37%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
5.87%12.59%9.03%12.95%-13.37%1.38%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.92%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLBX and FRHMX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.82

The correlation between TBLBX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLBX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLBX
TBLBX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TBLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLBXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.51

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

3.71

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.07

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.66

13.17

+0.49

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLBX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLBXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.51

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.82

-0.15

Drawdowns

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLBX drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLBX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLBXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-15.96%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-3.42%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-4.90%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-3.51%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

0.80%

+0.31%

Volatility

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund (TBLBX) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that TBLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLBXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.67%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

3.43%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

4.16%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

5.29%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

5.15%

+3.00%

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLBX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLBX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

TBLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FRHMX's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.26%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%
TBLBX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2010 Fund
3.22%3.41%3.18%2.23%3.92%1.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLBX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLBX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to FRHMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLBX dropped -18.87% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

TBLBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLBX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer