PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLAX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLAX achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZX's 9.67% return.


TBLAX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.30%
YTD
5.80%
6M
6.14%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
5.80%12.08%8.71%12.41%-13.11%1.40%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.67%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLAX and PLTZX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.92

The correlation between TBLAX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLAX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLAX
TBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLAXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.68

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

12.08

+1.96

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLAX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLAXPLTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.98

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.70

-0.01

Drawdowns

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLAX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLAX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLAXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-34.01%

+15.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-8.70%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.58%

-15.73%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-4.63%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.93%

-0.91%

Volatility

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund (TBLAX) is 1.87%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that TBLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLAXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

3.30%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

9.44%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

11.80%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.51%

15.46%

-7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.51%

15.99%

-8.48%

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLAX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

TBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.60%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%
TBLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2005 Fund
3.44%3.64%2.33%2.45%3.65%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TBLAX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to TBLAX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLAX dropped -18.31% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

TBLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLAX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer