TBLA vs. MGIC
TBLA (Taboola.com Ltd.) and MGIC (Magic Software Enterprises Ltd) are both stocks. TBLA operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while MGIC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, TBLA returned 15.71%/yr vs 19.58%/yr for MGIC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TBLA vs. MGIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLA achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than MGIC's -32.50% return.
TBLA
- 1D
- -5.97%
- 1M
- 20.58%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGIC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -32.50%
- 6M
- -28.89%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
TBLA vs. MGIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLA Taboola.com Ltd. | -0.87% | 26.30% | -15.70% | 40.58% | -60.41% | -24.83% |
MGIC Magic Software Enterprises Ltd | -32.50% | 123.97% | 29.28% | -36.46% | -21.27% | 30.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLA and MGIC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between TBLA and MGIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TBLA:
$1.32B
MGIC:
$853.34M
TBLA:
$0.36
MGIC:
$0.82
TBLA:
12.73
MGIC:
21.31
TBLA:
0.07
MGIC:
1.69
TBLA:
0.85
MGIC:
1.41
TBLA:
1.38
MGIC:
3.09
TBLA:
$1.65B
MGIC:
$603.22M
TBLA:
$579.78M
MGIC:
$169.17M
TBLA:
$210.19M
MGIC:
$86.68M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLA vs. MGIC — Risk / Return Rank
TBLA
MGIC
TBLA vs. MGIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLA | MGIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 0.23 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 0.57 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.27 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 0.47 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLA | MGIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.23 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.14 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
TBLA vs. MGIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLA drawdown since its inception was -84.76%, smaller than the maximum MGIC drawdown of -97.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLA and MGIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLA | MGIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.76% | -97.62% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.01% | -37.32% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.84% | -39.55% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.48% | -37.21% | -19.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.56% | -57.98% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.60% | 21.06% | -5.46% |
Volatility
TBLA vs. MGIC - Volatility Comparison
Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has a higher volatility of 26.03% compared to Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC) at 0.00%. This indicates that TBLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLA | MGIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.03% | 0.00% | +26.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.42% | 35.62% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.80% | 43.41% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.29% | 38.06% | +21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.29% | 35.26% | +24.03% |
Dividends
TBLA vs. MGIC - Dividend Comparison
TBLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGIC Magic Software Enterprises Ltd | 2.57% | 3.01% | 3.66% | 6.47% | 3.16% | 2.12% | 1.63% | 3.13% | 3.74% | 2.57% | 2.62% | 3.18% |
TBLA Taboola.com Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TBLA vs. MGIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taboola.com Ltd. and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TBLA vs. MGIC - Profitability Comparison
TBLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a gross profit of 129.58M and revenue of 164.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
MGIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.21M and revenue of 161.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
TBLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported an operating income of 69.38M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.
MGIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported an operating income of 17.12M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
TBLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a net income of 59.07M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.
MGIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a net income of 9.86M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLA and MGIC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBLA has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to MGIC (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLA dropped -84.76% vs MGIC's -97.62%.
TBLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLA and MGIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer