PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLA vs. MGIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBLA vs. MGIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLA achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than MGIC's -32.50% return.


TBLA

1D
-5.97%
1M
20.58%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
13.68%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10Y*

MGIC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-32.50%
6M
-28.89%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLA vs. MGIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
-0.87%26.30%-15.70%40.58%-60.41%-24.83%
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd
-32.50%123.97%29.28%-36.46%-21.27%30.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLA and MGIC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.24

The correlation between TBLA and MGIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TBLA:

$1.32B

MGIC:

$853.34M

EPS

TBLA:

$0.36

MGIC:

$0.82

PE Ratio

TBLA:

12.73

MGIC:

21.31

PEG Ratio

TBLA:

0.07

MGIC:

1.69

PS Ratio

TBLA:

0.85

MGIC:

1.41

PB Ratio

TBLA:

1.38

MGIC:

3.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBLA:

$1.65B

MGIC:

$603.22M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBLA:

$579.78M

MGIC:

$169.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

TBLA:

$210.19M

MGIC:

$86.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLA vs. MGIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLA
TBLA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TBLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MGIC
MGIC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLA vs. MGIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLAMGICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

0.57

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.27

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.82

0.47

+1.35

TBLA vs. MGIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the MGIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLA and MGIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLAMGICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.23

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.14

-0.40

Drawdowns

TBLA vs. MGIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLA drawdown since its inception was -84.76%, smaller than the maximum MGIC drawdown of -97.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLA and MGIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLAMGICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.76%

-97.62%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-37.32%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.84%

-39.55%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.48%

-37.21%

-19.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.56%

-57.98%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.60%

21.06%

-5.46%

Volatility

TBLA vs. MGIC - Volatility Comparison

Taboola.com Ltd. (TBLA) has a higher volatility of 26.03% compared to Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC) at 0.00%. This indicates that TBLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLAMGICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.03%

0.00%

+26.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.42%

35.62%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.80%

43.41%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.29%

38.06%

+21.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.29%

35.26%

+24.03%

Dividends

TBLA vs. MGIC - Dividend Comparison

TBLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd
2.57%3.01%3.66%6.47%3.16%2.12%1.63%3.13%3.74%2.57%2.62%3.18%
TBLA
Taboola.com Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TBLA vs. MGIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taboola.com Ltd. and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
164.02M
161.66M
(TBLA) Total Revenue
(MGIC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TBLA vs. MGIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taboola.com Ltd. and Magic Software Enterprises Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
27.4%
Portfolio components
TBLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a gross profit of 129.58M and revenue of 164.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

MGIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.21M and revenue of 161.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

TBLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported an operating income of 69.38M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.

MGIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported an operating income of 17.12M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

TBLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taboola.com Ltd. reported a net income of 59.07M and revenue of 164.02M, resulting in a net margin of 36.0%.

MGIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a net income of 9.86M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TBLA and MGIC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLA has higher volatility (26.03%) compared to MGIC (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLA dropped -84.76% vs MGIC's -97.62%.

TBLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLA and MGIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer