PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIRX vs. FSRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIRX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than FSRIX's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TBIRX has underperformed FSRIX with an annualized return of 0.91%, while FSRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.


TBIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.34%
6M
-1.04%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.59%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
0.91%
ALL TIME*
2.09%

FSRIX

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.23%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.74%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
3.98%
ALL TIME*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBIRX
Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class
-0.73%6.85%0.81%5.01%-13.87%-2.05%7.50%8.28%-0.57%3.17%
FSRIX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I
1.74%8.97%5.97%9.51%-11.91%3.50%7.50%11.01%-2.70%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIRX and FSRIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.51

The correlation between TBIRX and FSRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIRX vs. FSRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBIRX
TBIRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TBIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRIX
FSRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FSRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBIRXFSRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

2.20

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

8.52

-6.29

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the FSRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIRX and FSRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIRX drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum FSRIX drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIRX and FSRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBIRXFSRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-22.98%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-2.70%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-3.64%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.79%

-15.99%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.64%

-15.99%

-3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-1.71%

-4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-4.67%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.69%

+0.54%

Volatility

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I (FSRIX) have volatilities of 1.01% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBIRXFSRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.04%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

3.30%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

3.83%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

4.58%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.46%

+0.54%

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIRX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRIX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBIRX vs. FSRIX - Dividend Comparison

TBIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than FSRIX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRIX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class I
4.00%4.29%4.11%4.28%2.91%4.18%4.53%4.30%3.74%4.17%3.75%3.09%
TBIRX
Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class
3.42%3.48%2.91%2.23%1.89%1.81%2.90%2.56%2.23%2.19%2.06%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIRX and FSRIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to TBIRX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIRX dropped -19.64% vs FSRIX's -22.98%.

FSRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIRX and FSRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer