PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIRX vs. FIWDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FIWDX's 3.48% return.


TBIRX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
1.17%

FIWDX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.34%
YTD
3.48%
6M
3.89%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TBIRX
Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class
0.41%6.85%0.81%5.01%-13.87%-2.05%7.50%8.28%2.31%
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
3.48%8.98%6.07%9.20%-11.76%3.51%7.60%11.20%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIRX and FIWDX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.66

The correlation between TBIRX and FIWDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIRX vs. FIWDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIRX
TBIRX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TBIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FIWDX
FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBIRXFIWDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.56

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.69

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

15.71

-11.41

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FIWDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIRX and FIWDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIRX drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than FIWDX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIRX and FIWDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBIRXFIWDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-15.96%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.03%

-2.61%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-3.97%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.79%

-15.96%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-0.00%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-3.18%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.61%

+0.45%

Volatility

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class (TBIRX) is 1.14%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) has a volatility of 1.46%. This indicates that TBIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIWDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBIRXFIWDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.46%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

3.14%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

3.67%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

4.56%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.89%

+0.11%

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIRX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FIWDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBIRX vs. FIWDX - Dividend Comparison

TBIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than FIWDX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
4.34%4.39%4.21%4.02%2.99%4.28%4.62%4.39%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBIRX
Nuveen Bond Index Fund Retirement Class
3.65%3.48%2.91%2.23%1.89%1.81%2.90%2.56%2.23%2.19%2.06%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIRX and FIWDX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIWDX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to TBIRX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIRX dropped -19.64% vs FIWDX's -15.96%.

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIRX and FIWDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer