PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBIL vs. SCMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBIL vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.07% return.


TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*

SCMB

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBIL vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
1.49%4.19%5.15%5.12%0.80%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
1.07%3.78%0.91%5.86%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TBIL and SCMB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBIL vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMB
SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBIL vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBILSCMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

13.78

2.34

+11.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

58.40

3.45

+54.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

17.16

1.50

+15.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

196.84

2.36

+194.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

934.41

7.89

+926.51

TBIL vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBIL Sharpe Ratio is 13.78, which is higher than the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBIL and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBILSCMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.78

2.34

+11.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

14.07

0.97

+13.09

Drawdowns

TBIL vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and SCMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBILSCMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-6.13%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-2.92%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

-5.57%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.87%

-0.87%

Volatility

TBIL vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) is 0.08%, while Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that TBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBILSCMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

1.04%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

2.17%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29%

2.94%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

4.16%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.32%

4.16%

-3.84%

TBIL vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBIL vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SCMB's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
3.54%3.36%3.34%3.10%0.59%
TBIL
US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.82%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBIL and SCMB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCMB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to TBIL (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBIL dropped -0.10% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

On 3-year performance, TBIL leads with 4.64% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TBIL has performed better with a 4.64% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TBIL.

TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 3.54% for SCMB.

TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. TBIL tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill 3 Month Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.03% for SCMB.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.78 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBIL and SCMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer