TBIL vs. CPHY
TBIL (F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF) and CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index, while CPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CPHY.
Performance
TBIL vs. CPHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBIL achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than CPHY's 0.56% return.
TBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPHY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBIL vs. CPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 1.69% | 1.59% |
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.56% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBIL and CPHY is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBIL vs. CPHY — Risk / Return Rank
TBIL
CPHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBIL vs. CPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) and F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBIL | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 17.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 195.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 929.44 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBIL vs. CPHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum CPHY drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBIL and CPHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBIL | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -2.51% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.56% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
TBIL vs. CPHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBIL | CPHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29% | 3.57% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 3.57% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.32% | 3.57% | -3.25% |
TBIL vs. CPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBIL vs. CPHY - Dividend Comparison
TBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while CPHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBIL F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.07% | 5.02% | 5.00% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBIL and CPHY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CPHY.
TBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for CPHY.
TBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CPHY is High Yield Bonds. TBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 3M Total Return USD Unhedged Index, while CPHY tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TBIL and 0.35% for CPHY.
Find the right allocation for TBIL and CPHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer