TBG vs. VTV
TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TBG is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past year, TBG returned 18.63% vs 26.25% for VTV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
TBG vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBG achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.
TBG
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
TBG vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF | 10.42% | 7.50% | 20.58% | 9.66% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBG and VTV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TBG and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TBG vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBG
VTV
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
TBG
VTV
Energy
TBG
VTV
Financial Services
TBG
VTV
Consumer Defensive
TBG
VTV
Real Estate
TBG
VTV
Technology
TBG
VTV
Utilities
TBG
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
TBG
VTV
Industrials
TBG
VTV
Communication Services
TBG
VTV
Basic Materials
TBG
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBG vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
TBG
VTV
TBG vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 4.15 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 15.69 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.61 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.51 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
TBG vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBG drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBG and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -59.27% | +44.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.13% | -6.35% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | 0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -7.87% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.68% | +0.30% |
Volatility
TBG vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that TBG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBG | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 2.52% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 7.55% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 10.11% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 13.88% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 16.67% | -4.45% |
TBG vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBG vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
TBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF | 2.69% | 2.80% | 2.33% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBG and VTV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBG has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBG dropped -14.76% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 26.25% vs 18.63% for TBG. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 26.25% return vs 18.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TBG.
TBG has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.
They also come from different issuers: EA Series Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TBG and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBG and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer