TBFAX vs. FUAMX
TBFAX (Thrivent Government Bond) and FUAMX (Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TBFAX returned -0.09%/yr vs -0.53%/yr for FUAMX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBFAX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUAMX.
Performance
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBFAX achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -0.47% return.
TBFAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.18%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
FUAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.53%
- 10Y*
- —
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBFAX Thrivent Government Bond | -0.32% | 7.00% | 0.96% | 3.52% | -10.67% | -1.92% | 6.93% | 5.70% | -0.02% | -0.40% |
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.47% | 8.00% | 0.40% | 4.07% | -13.06% | -3.19% | 8.86% | 7.25% | 1.25% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBFAX and FUAMX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TBFAX and FUAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBFAX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank
TBFAX
FUAMX
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TBFAX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.93 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 2.51 | +0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, smaller than the maximum FUAMX drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFAX and FUAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBFAX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -20.25% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -3.72% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.55% | -6.04% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -18.27% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -6.89% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -7.32% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.38% | -0.22% |
Volatility
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Government Bond (TBFAX) is 1.12%, while Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that TBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBFAX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.36% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 3.19% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 4.28% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.65% | 6.63% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 5.84% | -1.11% |
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBFAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FUAMX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TBFAX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison
TBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than FUAMX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 3.52% | 3.58% | 2.19% | 1.24% | 1.76% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 2.23% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBFAX Thrivent Government Bond | 3.48% | 3.54% | 3.73% | 2.29% | 2.08% | 0.92% | 3.29% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 1.48% | 1.25% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TBFAX and FUAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FUAMX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to TBFAX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBFAX dropped -17.68% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.
TBFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBFAX and FUAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer