PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUAMX vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUAMX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUAMX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.70% return.


FUAMX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*

FBND

1D
0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.67%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUAMX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.37%8.00%0.40%4.08%-13.06%-3.19%8.86%7.25%1.25%-0.35%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.70%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FUAMX and FBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.85

The correlation between FUAMX and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUAMX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUAMX
FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUAMX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUAMXFBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.50

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

2.23

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.06

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

6.28

-2.94

FUAMX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUAMX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUAMXFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.50

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.16

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.45

-0.23

Drawdowns

FUAMX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUAMX drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUAMX and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUAMXFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-17.25%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.72%

-2.66%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-5.94%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.27%

-17.25%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-1.23%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-3.35%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.88%

+0.37%

Volatility

FUAMX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.28%. This indicates that FUAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUAMXFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.28%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

2.76%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

3.86%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

5.92%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

6.10%

-0.25%

FUAMX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUAMX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUAMX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FUAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than FBND's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.69%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.76%3.52%3.58%2.20%1.24%1.76%2.90%2.16%2.23%0.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FUAMX and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUAMX has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to FBND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUAMX dropped -20.25% vs FBND's -17.25%.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUAMX and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer