TBF vs. PFIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TBF (ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury) and PFIX (Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBF is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Index (-100%), while PFIX is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Simplify. TBF is passively managed, while PFIX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBF returned 9.96%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for PFIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBF charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PFIX.

Performance

TBF vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBF achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -11.52% return.

TBF

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 1.08%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

PFIX

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -14.94%
• YTD: -11.52%
• 6M: -9.81%
• 1Y: -14.90%
• 3Y*: 13.66%
• 5Y*: 16.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBF vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TBF ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury	0.30%	1.27%	16.33%	2.43%	42.37%	-9.97%
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF	-11.52%	0.42%	35.94%	5.67%	92.05%	-24.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TBF and PFIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021	0.85

The correlation between TBF and PFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBF vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBF

TBF Risk / Return Rank: 10
TBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TBF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TBF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

PFIX

PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBF vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBF	PFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	-0.51	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	-0.58	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.94	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	-0.58	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	-0.89	+1.21

TBF vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBF and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBF vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBF drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, which is greater than PFIX's maximum drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBF and PFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBF	PFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.40%	-36.17%	-34.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-25.64%	+18.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.79%	-36.17%	+18.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.79%	-36.17%	+18.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.55%	-27.05%	-17.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.41%	-17.17%	-30.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	16.83%	-13.49%

Volatility

TBF vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) is 2.46%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that TBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBF	PFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	7.76%	-5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	21.72%	-15.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.35%	29.36%	-20.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	38.51%	-22.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	38.24%	-23.74%

TBF vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBF has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBF vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

TBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PFIX's 10.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF	10.95%	9.92%	3.40%	87.92%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBF ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury	2.83%	3.39%	4.06%	4.99%	0.36%	0.00%	0.22%	1.68%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBF and PFIX in my portfolio?

TBF and PFIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBF or PFIX?

PFIX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to TBF (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBF dropped -70.40% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

Which ETF is better, TBF or PFIX?

On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 16.27% vs 9.96% for TBF. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TBF has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBF or PFIX?

Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBF or PFIX?

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for TBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBF or PFIX?

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 10.95%, compared with 2.83% for TBF.

What is the main difference between TBF and PFIX?

TBF is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while PFIX is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for TBF and 0.50% for PFIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.