PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBF vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBF vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBF achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than PFIX's 5.83% return.


TBF

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.99%
6M
4.48%
YTD
5.32%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
3.52%
ALL TIME*
-2.94%

PFIX

1D
-2.84%
1M
12.08%
6M
6.04%
YTD
5.83%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
21.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.34M$6.64M$16.82M
$5.03M$3.82M$5.32M

TBF vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
5.32%1.27%16.33%2.43%42.37%-9.97%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.83%0.42%35.94%5.67%92.05%-24.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TBF and PFIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

0.85

The correlation between TBF and PFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBF vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBF
TBF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBF vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBFPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.04

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.14

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

0.22

+2.35

TBF vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBF and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBF vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBF drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, which is greater than PFIX's maximum drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBF and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.40%

-36.17%

-34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-23.71%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-36.17%

+18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-36.17%

+18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.77%

-12.74%

-29.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.37%

-17.18%

-30.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

15.41%

-12.53%

Volatility

TBF vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) is 2.56%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that TBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBFPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

8.24%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

22.14%

-15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.11%

29.10%

-19.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

38.65%

-23.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

38.12%

-23.68%

TBF vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBF has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBF vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

TBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than PFIX's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
8.18%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
2.70%3.39%4.06%4.99%0.36%0.00%0.22%1.68%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBF and PFIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to TBF (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBF dropped -70.40% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 21.59% vs 12.07% for TBF. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TBF has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for TBF.

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 2.70% for TBF.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for TBF and 0.50% for PFIX.

TBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBF and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer