PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBF vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBF vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBF achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.


TBF

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
2.38%
6M
4.57%
1Y
0.68%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
2.77%

DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBF vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
2.38%1.27%16.33%2.43%42.37%1.33%-19.35%-10.96%3.26%-8.46%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TBF and DIVO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.08

The correlation between TBF and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TBF vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TBF
DIVO

Financial Services

48.6%
30.3%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.9%

Energy

-

6.8%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

16.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

14.5%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Financial Services

TBF
48.6%
DIVO
30.3%

Basic Materials

TBF

-

DIVO
4.1%

Communication Services

TBF

-

DIVO
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TBF

-

DIVO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

TBF

-

DIVO
6.9%

Energy

TBF

-

DIVO
6.8%

Healthcare

TBF

-

DIVO
6.7%

Industrials

TBF

-

DIVO
16.2%

Real Estate

TBF

-

DIVO

-

Technology

TBF

-

DIVO
14.5%

Utilities

TBF

-

DIVO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBF vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBF
TBF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBF vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBFDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.36

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

3.10

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

11.21

-11.00

TBF vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBF and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBFDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.06

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.85

-1.06

Drawdowns

TBF vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBF drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBF and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBFDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.40%

-30.04%

-40.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-5.95%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-12.12%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-13.72%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.40%

-0.82%

-42.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.43%

-2.61%

-44.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.64%

+1.63%

Volatility

TBF vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that TBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBFDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.01%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

6.88%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

8.97%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

11.94%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.52%

14.84%

-0.32%

TBF vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBF has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBF vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

TBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
2.84%3.39%4.06%4.99%0.36%0.00%0.22%1.68%0.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBF and DIVO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBF has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBF dropped -70.40% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs 10.00% for TBF. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for TBF.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.84% for TBF.

TBF is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for TBF and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBF and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer