TBDAX vs. FGKFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TBDAX (PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund) and FGKFX (Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TBDAX returned 16.42%/yr vs 17.78%/yr for FGKFX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TBDAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FGKFX.

Performance

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund (TBDAX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBDAX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 24.57% return.

TBDAX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 30.05%
• 5Y*: 16.42%
• 10Y*: 19.20%

FGKFX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 7.66%
• YTD: 24.57%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 51.36%
• 3Y*: 32.80%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TBDAX PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund	8.42%	17.74%	49.37%	46.04%	-32.89%	22.14%	42.35%	15.99%
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	24.57%	21.67%	35.46%	46.02%	-32.62%	22.06%	68.76%	15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TBDAX and FGKFX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019	0.96

The correlation between TBDAX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBDAX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBDAX

TBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 25
TBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
TBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FGKFX

FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund (TBDAX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBDAX	FGKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.84	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	3.49	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.47	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	4.63	-3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	18.56	-13.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBDAX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBDAX	FGKFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.84	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.74	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.98	-0.63

Drawdowns

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBDAX drawdown since its inception was -69.54%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBDAX and FGKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBDAX	FGKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.54%	-40.14%	-29.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.79%	-11.40%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.05%	-27.38%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	-40.14%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-0.09%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-10.01%	-15.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	2.83%	+1.74%

Volatility

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund (TBDAX) is 3.87%, while Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that TBDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBDAX	FGKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	4.49%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	14.29%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	18.59%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.57%	24.13%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	25.74%	-3.26%

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBDAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBDAX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

TBDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.18%	2.64%	0.93%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBDAX PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund	4.33%	4.69%	25.46%	0.00%	0.00%	24.42%	16.89%	7.91%	10.66%	11.19%	3.34%	7.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBDAX and FGKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, TBDAX and FGKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TBDAX or FGKFX?

FGKFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to TBDAX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBDAX dropped -69.54% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.