TBCIX vs. PBCKX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TBCIX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TBCIX returned 16.53%/yr vs 15.76%/yr for PBCKX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TBCIX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.

Performance

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBCIX achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly lower than PBCKX's -2.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TBCIX having a 16.53% annualized return and PBCKX not far behind at 15.76%.

TBCIX

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: -1.33%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 1Y: 5.31%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 16.53%
• ALL TIME*: 15.86%

PBCKX

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: -0.54%
• YTD: -2.47%
• 1Y: -3.06%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 15.76%
• ALL TIME*: 15.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	-3.25%	18.94%	48.73%	49.61%	-38.48%	18.30%	34.90%	30.30%	2.13%	36.68%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	-2.47%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TBCIX and PBCKX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.91

The correlation between TBCIX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TBCIX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBCIX

TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBCIX	PBCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	-0.32	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	-0.33	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.96	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	-0.27	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.68	-0.76	+1.44

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBCIX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBCIX drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBCIX and PBCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBCIX	PBCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.26%	-38.00%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.96%	-19.10%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.06%	-19.10%	-3.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.26%	-38.00%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.26%	-38.00%	-5.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.96%	-6.17%	-2.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	-5.66%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.64%	6.87%	-1.23%

Volatility

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) at 4.86%. This indicates that TBCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBCIX	PBCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	4.86%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	13.43%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.67%	16.32%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.16%	20.52%	+3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.85%	20.23%	+2.62%

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBCIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBCIX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

TBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than PBCKX's 20.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	20.45%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class	5.38%	5.20%	18.28%	3.47%	5.84%	10.03%	1.18%	0.59%	2.50%	3.05%	0.81%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBCIX and PBCKX in my portfolio?

TBCIX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBCIX or PBCKX?

TBCIX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to PBCKX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBCIX dropped -43.26% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.