PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBBK vs. AAMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TBBK vs. AAMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) and Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBBK achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than AAMI's 67.66% return.


TBBK

1D
1.70%
1M
9.20%
YTD
-14.90%
6M
-16.46%
1Y
12.20%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
17.77%
10Y*
24.45%

AAMI

1D
1.21%
1M
11.99%
YTD
67.66%
6M
65.23%
1Y
148.44%
3Y*
52.17%
5Y*
28.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBBK vs. AAMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TBBK
The Bancorp, Inc.
-14.90%28.29%36.49%35.87%12.13%85.42%5.24%62.94%-24.83%
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
67.66%78.64%37.70%-6.72%-19.45%33.00%93.85%-0.80%-30.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TBBK and AAMI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TBBK:

$2.45B

AAMI:

$2.81B

EPS

TBBK:

$5.09

AAMI:

$2.35

PE Ratio

TBBK:

11.28

AAMI:

33.42

PS Ratio

TBBK:

3.80

AAMI:

4.39

PB Ratio

TBBK:

3.51

AAMI:

36.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

TBBK:

$686.06M

AAMI:

$641.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TBBK:

$394.85M

AAMI:

$652.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

TBBK:

$230.08M

AAMI:

$185.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBBK vs. AAMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBBK
TBBK Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TBBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBBK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TBBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AAMI
AAMI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AAMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AAMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBBK vs. AAMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) and Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBBKAAMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.55

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

8.21

-7.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

22.26

-21.66

TBBK vs. AAMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBBK Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the AAMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBBK and AAMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBBK vs. AAMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBBK drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, which is greater than AAMI's maximum drawdown of -75.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBBK and AAMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBBKAAMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.68%

-75.23%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.92%

-18.20%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-31.52%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.94%

-51.45%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.48%

0.00%

-28.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.53%

-20.62%

-26.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.43%

6.70%

+13.73%

Volatility

TBBK vs. AAMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) is 8.48%, while Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that TBBK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBBKAAMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

11.53%

-3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.93%

26.79%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.30%

39.95%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.06%

34.69%

+11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

42.10%

+8.68%

Dividends

TBBK vs. AAMI - Dividend Comparison

TBBK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
0.29%0.09%0.15%0.21%0.19%0.16%1.19%3.91%2.81%
TBBK
The Bancorp, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TBBK vs. AAMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bancorp, Inc. and Acadian Asset Management Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
72.53M
167.10M
(TBBK) Total Revenue
(AAMI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TBBK vs. AAMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Bancorp, Inc. and Acadian Asset Management Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
95.3%
Portfolio components
TBBK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 159.30M and revenue of 167.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

TBBK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AAMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 42.00M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

TBBK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 60.07M and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in a net margin of 82.8%.

AAMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 24.30M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TBBK and AAMI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAMI has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to TBBK (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBBK dropped -92.68% vs AAMI's -75.23%.

AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBBK and AAMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer