PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TAXM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXMIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

TAXM vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXMIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

0.00%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

Volatility

TAXM vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

0.00%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

0.00%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

0.00%

+3.56%

TAXM vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

TAXM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer