PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 22.58% return.


TAXM

1D
0.04%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.72%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBC

1D
-0.80%
1M
-10.25%
YTD
22.58%
6M
22.42%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and DBC is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAXMDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.62

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

6.82

+1.14

TAXM vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-76.36%

+73.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-13.51%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-29.09%

+28.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-46.17%

+45.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

3.97%

-3.18%

Volatility

TAXM vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) is 0.67%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that TAXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

4.60%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

16.16%

-14.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

18.75%

-16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.51%

19.20%

-15.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.51%

17.81%

-14.30%

TAXM vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than DBC's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.72%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and DBC have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to TAXM (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs DBC's -76.36%.

On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 21.81% vs 6.25% for TAXM. On fees, TAXM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 21.81% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAXM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

TAXM has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.72% for DBC.

TAXM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.85% for DBC.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer