PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXM vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXM vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 25.44% return.


TAXM

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
25.44%
6M
24.53%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXM vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXM and CMDY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXM vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXM vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXMCMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.42

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.82

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

14.50

-5.88

TAXM vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXM Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXM and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXMCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.32

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.56

+0.58

Drawdowns

TAXM vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXM drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXM and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXMCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-31.19%

+28.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-7.73%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-3.97%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-13.14%

+12.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

2.57%

-1.80%

Volatility

TAXM vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) is 0.94%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that TAXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXMCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

5.04%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

14.20%

-12.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

16.06%

-13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

15.80%

-12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

14.63%

-11.07%

TAXM vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXM vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

TAXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than CMDY's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.28%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.29%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXM and CMDY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMDY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TAXM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXM dropped -3.10% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 1-year performance, CMDY leads with 37.10% vs 6.62% for TAXM. On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 37.10% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TAXM.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.28%, compared with 3.29% for TAXM.

TAXM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TAXM and 0.28% for CMDY.

TAXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXM and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer