PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXI vs. CAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXI vs. CAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI) and AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXI achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than CAM's 1.29% return.


TAXI

1D
0.15%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAM

1D
0.06%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXI vs. CAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXI and CAM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXI vs. CAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI) and AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TAXI vs. CAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXICAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.95

1.81

+1.15

Drawdowns

TAXI vs. CAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXI drawdown since its inception was -2.23%, roughly equal to the maximum CAM drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXI and CAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXICAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-2.19%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.58%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-0.50%

+0.04%

Volatility

TAXI vs. CAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXICAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

2.13%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.90%

2.13%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.90%

2.13%

-0.23%

TAXI vs. CAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXI has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CAM's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TAXI vs. CAM - Dividend Comparison

TAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than CAM's 2.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAXI and CAM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CAM.

CAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXI and 0.27% for CAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXI and CAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer