TAXF vs. ZMUN
TAXF (American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. TAXF is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAXF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXF achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.57% return.
TAXF
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 1.96% | 1.56% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXF and ZMUN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXF vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
TAXF
ZMUN
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAXF | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAXF | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 6.46 | -5.84 |
Drawdowns
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXF drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXF and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXF | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -0.09% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.02% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -0.01% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXF | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 0.54% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 0.54% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 0.54% | +4.11% |
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAXF vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
TAXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAXF American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF | 3.47% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.93% | 2.05% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 2.64% | 0.69% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXF and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
TAXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TAXF and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for TAXF and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer