PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAXF vs. CSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAXF vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAXF achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.


TAXF

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.23%
1Y
8.33%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*

CSHP

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAXF vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAXF and CSHP is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAXF vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAXF
TAXF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TAXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAXF vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAXFCSHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-27.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

7.44

-5.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

65.71

-62.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

432.16

-421.86

TAXF vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAXF and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAXFCSHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

11.91

-9.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

10.75

-10.13

Drawdowns

TAXF vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAXF drawdown since its inception was -13.93%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXF and CSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAXFCSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-0.08%

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-0.06%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-0.00%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.01%

+0.80%

Volatility

TAXF vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that TAXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAXFCSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.07%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

0.24%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

0.33%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.20%

0.40%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

0.40%

+4.25%

TAXF vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAXF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAXF vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

TAXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.92%5.39%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
3.47%3.68%3.38%2.93%2.05%1.58%2.13%2.64%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAXF and CSHP have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAXF has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAXF dropped -13.93% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

On 1-year performance, TAXF leads with 8.33% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TAXF has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TAXF.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 3.47% for TAXF.

TAXF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for TAXF and 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAXF and CSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer