TAX vs. GVAL
TAX (Cambria Tax Aware ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TAX returned 23.75% vs 39.69% for GVAL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
TAX vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAX achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 14.37% return.
TAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TAX vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TAX Cambria Tax Aware ETF | 8.40% | 16.72% | 0.25% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 14.37% | 55.87% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAX and GVAL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TAX and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAX vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TAX
GVAL
TAX vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tax Aware ETF (TAX) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.49 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.47 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 13.33 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.75 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.35 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
TAX vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAX drawdown since its inception was -18.85%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAX and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.85% | -46.82% | +27.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -11.50% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -1.24% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -13.88% | +10.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.99% | -0.13% |
Volatility
TAX vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Tax Aware ETF (TAX) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) have volatilities of 4.93% and 5.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.10% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 12.72% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 14.52% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 18.46% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 19.21% | -0.44% |
TAX vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAX vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
TAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than GVAL's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.83% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
TAX Cambria Tax Aware ETF | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAX and GVAL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to TAX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAX dropped -18.85% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 1-year performance, GVAL leads with 39.69% vs 23.75% for TAX. On fees, TAX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TAX has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 39.69% return vs 23.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.32% for TAX.
TAX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TAX and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAX and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer