PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAVFX vs. PGROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) and BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAVFX achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than PGROX's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TAVFX has underperformed PGROX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while PGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


TAVFX

1D
1.59%
1M
4.97%
6M
7.17%
YTD
15.50%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
16.88%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
10.45%

PGROX

1D
2.22%
1M
0.69%
6M
3.07%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
11.85%
ALL TIME*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAVFX
Third Avenue Value Fund
15.50%35.93%-2.43%20.26%17.46%22.39%7.76%12.95%-25.95%8.81%
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
3.41%13.46%7.88%22.40%-17.75%23.85%24.43%34.92%-8.66%27.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TAVFX and PGROX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1993

0.67

The correlation between TAVFX and PGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAVFX vs. PGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAVFX
TAVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TAVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PGROX
PGROX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) and BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAVFXPGROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

0.81

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

3.04

+9.31

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the PGROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAVFX and PGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAVFX drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, which is greater than PGROX's maximum drawdown of -47.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAVFX and PGROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAVFXPGROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.11%

-47.75%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.70%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.11%

-23.81%

-42.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.11%

-26.99%

-39.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.11%

-30.17%

-35.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.91%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-8.43%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.11%

+0.01%

Volatility

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Volatility Comparison

Third Avenue Value Fund (TAVFX) and BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) have volatilities of 4.07% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAVFXPGROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

4.13%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

10.96%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

13.58%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.99%

17.85%

+64.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.27%

17.95%

+42.32%

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAVFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PGROX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAVFX vs. PGROX - Dividend Comparison

TAVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than PGROX's 17.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
17.16%17.72%11.89%1.88%7.61%8.12%4.05%7.44%13.96%13.45%8.19%8.46%
TAVFX
Third Avenue Value Fund
6.00%6.93%9.86%4.48%5.67%3.74%0.70%5.95%4.45%3.03%8.24%8.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAVFX and PGROX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGROX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to TAVFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAVFX dropped -66.11% vs PGROX's -47.75%.

TAVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAVFX and PGROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer