PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TARKX vs. NMPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tarkio Fund (TARKX) and Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARKX achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than NMPAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TARKX has outperformed NMPAX with an annualized return of 15.74%, while NMPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.57% annualized return.


TARKX

1D
2.71%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
23.23%
6M
20.89%
1Y
56.94%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
15.74%

NMPAX

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
10.36%
6M
8.22%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TARKX
Tarkio Fund
23.23%30.18%21.72%26.33%-30.39%24.41%27.00%29.54%-23.30%29.04%
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
10.36%7.23%13.67%16.32%-13.27%24.66%8.71%25.99%-11.44%15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TARKX and NMPAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.89

The correlation between TARKX and NMPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TARKX vs. NMPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARKX
TARKX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NMPAX
NMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tarkio Fund (TARKX) and Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TARKXNMPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.19

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

7.80

+4.43

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the NMPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARKX and NMPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARKX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, smaller than the maximum NMPAX drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARKX and NMPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TARKXNMPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-54.31%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

-8.84%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.99%

-24.03%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.38%

-24.03%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-42.09%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-4.69%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-7.71%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

2.47%

+2.19%

Volatility

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Volatility Comparison

Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) at 6.22%. This indicates that TARKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TARKXNMPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

6.22%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.84%

12.44%

+9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.40%

16.33%

+12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.73%

19.81%

+7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

21.14%

+5.60%

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARKX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NMPAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TARKX vs. NMPAX - Dividend Comparison

TARKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than NMPAX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
5.93%9.34%11.35%7.97%11.65%18.03%5.96%5.70%10.06%7.66%7.97%10.12%
TARKX
Tarkio Fund
4.46%5.50%1.51%2.98%10.62%1.40%0.50%5.21%3.34%1.70%0.47%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TARKX and NMPAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARKX has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to NMPAX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARKX dropped -40.55% vs NMPAX's -54.31%.

TARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TARKX and NMPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer