TARKX vs. LLSCX
TARKX (Tarkio Fund) and LLSCX (Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TARKX returned 15.74%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for LLSCX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TARKX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LLSCX.
Performance
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TARKX achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TARKX has outperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 15.74%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.00% annualized return.
TARKX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 59.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
LLSCX
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- 1Y
- -4.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 23.23% | 30.18% | 21.72% | 26.33% | -30.39% | 24.41% | 27.00% | 29.54% | -23.30% | 29.04% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -7.36% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TARKX and LLSCX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TARKX and LLSCX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TARKX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
TARKX
LLSCX
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tarkio Fund (TARKX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TARKX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.96 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | -0.35 | +4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.58 | -0.81 | +14.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TARKX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARKX and LLSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TARKX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.55% | -63.97% | +23.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.99% | -11.44% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.99% | -15.40% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.38% | -26.67% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.55% | -42.23% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -11.44% | +10.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -8.90% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 5.00% | -0.35% |
Volatility
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 4.07%. This indicates that TARKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TARKX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 4.07% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.64% | 9.02% | +12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.26% | 13.14% | +15.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.69% | 16.98% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 24.60% | +2.17% |
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TARKX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TARKX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
TARKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than LLSCX's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.27% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 4.46% | 5.50% | 1.51% | 2.98% | 10.62% | 1.40% | 0.50% | 5.21% | 3.34% | 1.70% | 0.47% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TARKX and LLSCX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARKX has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to LLSCX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARKX dropped -40.55% vs LLSCX's -63.97%.
TARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TARKX and LLSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer