PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAN vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAN vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a 47.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TAN has outperformed DBE with an annualized return of 13.81%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.


TAN

1D
1.60%
1M
21.93%
YTD
47.13%
6M
51.73%
1Y
127.12%
3Y*
0.29%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
13.81%

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAN vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
47.13%48.31%-37.61%-26.79%-5.24%-25.10%233.96%66.53%-25.67%54.38%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TAN and DBE is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2008

0.26

The correlation between TAN and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAN vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAN
TAN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAN vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TANDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.44

2.37

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

2.91

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.39

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.06

6.10

+2.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.01

11.98

+10.02

TAN vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAN Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAN and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TANDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

2.37

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.66

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.09

-0.21

Drawdowns

TAN vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than DBE's maximum drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TANDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.29%

-86.69%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.62%

-14.41%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.40%

-23.89%

-40.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.95%

-38.74%

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.53%

-60.84%

-17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.81%

-31.85%

-34.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.51%

-57.31%

-21.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

7.34%

-1.73%

Volatility

TAN vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is 11.81%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that TAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TANDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

13.47%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.30%

30.80%

-5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.21%

35.02%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.74%

29.37%

+10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.98%

28.33%

+9.65%

TAN vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAN has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAN vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.69%1.77%5.04%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAN and DBE have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to TAN (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAN dropped -95.29% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, TAN leads with 13.81% vs 11.78% for DBE. On fees, TAN is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TAN has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TAN has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAN is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for TAN.

TAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. TAN tracks MAC Global Solar Energy Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TAN and 0.78% for DBE.

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAN and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer